Current time: 31-08-2014, 03:14 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Which pokemon should have (pre)evolutions?
27-11-2010, 01:30 AM
Post: #76
RE: Which pokemon should have (pre)evolutions?
Junx? I'll forgive it because those two keys are beside each other.ou're right, Jinx does need to evolve

REDNECK, WHITE TRASH, BLUE COLLAR. WELCOME TO AMERICA
27-11-2010, 08:01 AM
Post: #77
RE: Which pokemon should have (pre)evolutions?
To answer your question, KALAS RAY, the Gyarados evolution could be a Dragon-Ice Pokemon. Opinion?

[Image: bac5f8249a4f870305cb04e7933c9990.gif]
Dark Psychic Poison The Ultimate Power!
27-11-2010, 08:36 PM
Post: #78
RE: Which pokemon should have (pre)evolutions?
No. Gyarados would lose both it's original attributes, and that never happens. The closest thing to that was when Pupitar, rock/ground evolves into Tyranitar, rock

REDNECK, WHITE TRASH, BLUE COLLAR. WELCOME TO AMERICA
04-12-2010, 06:51 AM
Post: #79
RE: Which pokemon should have (pre)evolutions?
Never mind. Sheesh!

[Image: bac5f8249a4f870305cb04e7933c9990.gif]
Dark Psychic Poison The Ultimate Power!
20-01-2011, 08:13 AM
Post: #80
RE: Which pokemon should have (pre)evolutions?
I believe all Pokemon but legendaries should evolve at least once.
I though Alomomola would be the evolution of Luvdisc and Buffalon would be the evolution of Tauros.
I also believe Nageki and Dageki (not sure of English names yet) will eventually be like Hitmonlee and Hitmonchan (if theres a 6th gen) where they both evolve from the same Pokemon. I also believe something similar would be true for Plusle and Minun and Volbeat and Illumise.




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

IRC chatroom members get all the latest news about future site updates and new projects, even days before they are announced in the forums or the main site, so why don't you enter #legendary_pokemon now?